Ten things to settle together

All three pilot units are ready this week. This page takes the list Simon wrote after the conference, puts the research under each item, and leaves room to write the decision down.

The agenda

In the order they depend on each other.

Sectors shape the model. The model shapes the price, the price shapes funding and the waitlist, and all of it feeds the timeline, the team, sales and the raise. Brand sits across the top.

Deadlines that land before or during the day

25 Sep

DTA AI Government Showcase (11 Nov) tells SMEs whether their exhibitor applications were accepted. Check whether we applied.

28 Sep

Queensland Gambling Community Benefit Fund round closes (up to A$35K for NFP equipment). Rounds recur several times a year.

30 Sep

End of Q3, the original target for closing the raise. NACCHO conference early-bird rate ends.

12–14 Oct

ACFID national conference, Canberra. The next room full of development buyers after Situation 2026.

Decision boxes on this page save in this browser only. Use "Copy all decisions" at the bottom to paste them somewhere permanent.

01
Target sectors

Who Selma is for, beyond the convenient start.

Simon's noteIt's got applications way beyond not-for-profit, that's just been a convenient starting point for the story. Government, DFAT and international development is apparently a big opportunity too.
AudienceSizeWhat's pulling nowMain catchFirst ticket
Not-for-profits~2,500 in Australia50% name privacy or sovereignty as the main AI barrier; OVIC block ends 5 NovThin, tied money; cloud AI ~A$12 a seatA$12K–40K
DevelopmentA$5.2b aid; A$2.2b PacificDFAT has no AI position; Fiji digital package; PNG sovereign AI framework6–18 month cycles, probity, free substitutesA$40K scoping, A$150K–280K pilot
Government~900 bodiesDirect buys under A$125K from Australian SMEs; DTA registers; ADM 10 DecIRAP, Qwen provenance, long cyclesA$25K–45K pilot
SMEs~3,700 mid-sizedTPB client-consent rule; privilege; shadow AICrowded, ~A$30 seat anchor, brand driftA$6K–20K setup
Enterprise~5,400 largeAPRA AI letter; nothing local between Copilot and AI factoriesCertifications, vendor-risk reviewsA$40K–70K per department

A practical way to frame it: which one or two audiences get active selling effort for the next six months, which get a waitlist and a polite "not yet", and which get nothing? With a small team, "all five" means none get done well.

To decide

  1. Lead audiences for the next six months (one or two).
  2. Is development a revenue line now, a strategic flag, or both?
  3. Do corporate buyers go on the waitlist now, or are they parked until 2027?
02
Business model

An upfront price you can buy with capital, and a licence with a heartbeat.

Simon's noteUpfront cost plus annual licence. What's the upfront, what's the licence, what services are included in the licence (model upgrades, monthly public data corpus downloads, monthly skills updates)?

The structure the research keeps pointing to

Upfront: a capital bundle

  • The unit, installation, Commissioning Workshop, ingestion and measurement to go-live, and a perpetual licence to the software version installed.
  • Because the buyer owns it and it runs on their own infrastructure, all of this can be capitalised. Copilot and ChatGPT can't: cloud fees must be expensed.
  • Keep it physical, serialised and asset-tagged. That's what makes it capex.

Annual: an operating subscription

  • Everything that keeps Selma current: models, data, skills, support, re-measurement, hardware swap.
  • This is opex. Don't fold the upfront into the annual fee, or the whole thing becomes opex and the capital advantage is lost.
  • If the client stops paying, the unit keeps working on the version it has. That is the honest "you own it" answer.

What the licence could include, and how often

InclusionCadence (a starting proposal)What it gives the client
Public data corpus downloadsMonthlyNew grants for their sector, newly published research, legislation and regulator guidance, loaded into their Selma
Skills updatesMonthlyNew use cases and personas (e.g. grant eligibility checker, funder report writer, audit prep) built by the Use Case Maker and tested before release
Model upgradesQuarterly, or when a better open model is provenBetter answers without new hardware, with a documented model list (including non-Chinese options)
Obligation packsQuarterlyDated legislation and regulator guidance for their sector
Re-measurementAnnuallyFresh accuracy figures against their own documents, for their board and auditors
Support and health monitoringOngoingHelp desk, remote health checks where the configuration allows, patching
Hardware swap and refreshOn failure; refresh at year 3–4No dead box. The refresh is the natural renewal moment.

Price points that line up with how money is released

Capital bundleWhy that number
Over A$10KClears the new NSW Treasury capitalisation threshold (A$10K, Sept 2026) and most council thresholds, so it sits in capital budgets
Up to A$20K ex GSTFits the Stronger Communities Programme cap (A$20K; "ICT hardware" named as eligible in Round 9) and the small business instant asset write-off (A$20K, permanent from July 2026)
A$30K–35KFits the Queensland Gambling Community Benefit Fund cap (A$35K) and half of a A$60K–75K matched equipment project

Two tiers could cover most buyers: a "Community" bundle just under A$20K and a "Standard" bundle around A$30K–35K, each with an annual licence. The pricing calculator tests any combination against cost and Copilot.

To decide

  1. The upfront price, and whether there are one or two capital tiers.
  2. The annual licence, and exactly what's in it, on what cadence.
  3. Founding partner rate for the three pioneers, and for how long it's locked.
  4. Does the licence scale with anything (sites, users, packs), or is it flat?
03
Funding and grants

Selma is the AI you can buy with capital.

Simon's noteOne guy was talking about government capex matching schemes, and how he didn't have anything he wanted to spend capex money on, but now he's seen Selma he wants one. Then there's all the other grant avenues available.

The likely reason he had nothing to spend it on: under accounting rules (the 2021 IFRIC decision, and Finance's guidance RMG 109 for Commonwealth bodies), subscription AI like Copilot or ChatGPT has to be expensed. Organisations holding capital budgets or matched capital grants have had no AI they're allowed to buy with them. Selma is hardware the buyer owns, running on their own infrastructure, so it can be capitalised. Our reading

We don't know which scheme he meant. Worth asking him directly: "Was it a grant you applied for, a council or department capital budget, or the tax write-off?"

Most likely candidates for "capex matching"

SchemeBuyerMatchMaxStatus (22 Sep)
Queensland Business Growth FundQld SMEs, specialised equipmentBusiness pays at least 50%A$75KRound 7 closed; Round 8 not announced
Council or agency capital budgetsCouncils, agencies, libraries, TAFEsInternal; several grant programs require councils to match 1:1BudgetAnnual; unspent capital peaks April to June
Instant asset write-offBusinesses under A$10M turnover~25% effective via taxA$20K per assetPermanent from 1 July 2026

Other routes to fund a unit

SchemeForUp toStatusFit
Qld Gambling Community Benefit FundQld NFPs, equipmentA$35KRound closes 28 Sep; recurringHigh
Stronger Communities Programme R10NFPs (100%), councils (50%)A$20KA$22.5M budgeted; dates and guidelines TBA (Round 9 named ICT hardware as eligible). MPs nominate, so talk to local members early.High if under A$20K
NSW Community Building PartnershipNSW NFPs and councilsA$100K2026 closed; next round 2027; IT eligibility to confirmMedium
Lotterywest, SA Expand TogetherWA NFPs; SA multicultural orgsVaries / A$100KVaries / next roundMedium
NIAA Indigenous Advancement StrategyACCOs, community-led proposalsNegotiatedOpen by approach via regional officesMedium
Fiji digital package (Vuvale Union)Fiji, via DFAT's contractorFJ$146.3M totalAnnounced 30 Aug 2026; probably the money behind the Fiji hub InferenceHigh, via procurement
REnew PacificOff-grid energy, Pacific and Timor-LesteA$75M programNo open callWatch, for solar Selma

Money for EthicAI itself

R&D Tax Incentive

43.5% refundable offset on eligible R&D. Accuracy measurement, Guardrail and retrieval evaluation may qualify. Needs records kept as the work happens.

Export Market Development Grants

1:1 matching, up to A$80K a year for new markets, for Pacific and Timor-Leste marketing and travel.

CSIRO Kick-Start

A$20K–60K matched, open now. Independent validation of accuracy or off-grid energy use.

Closed or paused

Industry Growth Program (paused May 2026), DFAT Business Partnerships Platform (closed), AI Adopt (closed). EMIIF invests through funds only.

A cheap, useful asset: a one-page "Selma for grant applications" sheet with an itemised quote (hardware, commissioning, licence split), an asset description ("on-premises AI server, 4-year effective life"), an ownership statement and community-benefit language. Most community grants reject items without a supplier quote.

To decide

  1. Who asks the capex contact which scheme he meant, and when.
  2. Do we build the grant-ready quote pack before the next event?
  3. Do we help pioneer partners apply (the grant-application use case), and for which schemes first?
  4. R&D Tax Incentive and EMDG: who talks to the accountant?
04
Waiting list

A Founding Partner list, not an email box.

Simon's noteSomething to point people to when they want it but can't have it. This is the thing I wish I'd thought of at the conference, and it'll be super useful for investor chats to say we have a waitlist.

One thing it fixes: our own Selma language currently says never to describe enquirers as "waiting", because an enquiry isn't a waiting list. A real list, with levels and definitions, makes the claim honest and gives investors a number they can trust.

LevelWhat they doWhat they getHow we report it
1. RegisteredFill in a 10-question qualifying formUpdates and briefing invitationsAlways shown beside the qualified number, never alone
2. QualifiedDiscovery call held; sensitive-data use case, budget path and decision-maker confirmedReadiness assessment, draft Charter conversationWith a one-line definition in the deck
3. ReservedSign a short letter of intent, or pay a refundable depositA place in a dated install batch, founding price locked for 12 months"Z reservations totalling A$X". The number investors weight most.

The qualifying form

  • Organisation and ABN; sector; number of people who'd use it
  • Most sensitive information they hold
  • First use case, in their own words (the best signal)
  • Current AI use: banned, informal, Copilot, none
  • Deployment preference: air-gapped, local, remote
  • Budget path: operating, capital, a specific grant, a funder, unknown
  • Timing; role and whether they decide
  • A separate, unticked marketing consent box (Spam Act) and a proper privacy notice

Deposits, if we take them

  • A$500–1,000 per site, fully refundable until a service agreement is signed, then credited to the Commissioning Workshop
  • Refundable keeps it clear of unfair contract terms rules for small businesses
  • Held in a separate account; confirm GST treatment with the accountant
  • A "no-deposit letter of intent" path for government and bigger NFPs, reported separately
  • Dated batches make scarcity honest: "Batch 1 installs Q1 2027, 6 of 10 places reserved"
  • Never count free pilots as reservations

Tools: Tally or Typeform for the form, a free CRM (e.g. HubSpot) with a "level" field, Stripe payment links or an invoice for deposits. The QR on the pull-up banners (selma.au/conference) can point straight at it. Suggestions from the research, not legal advice.

To decide

  1. Do we take deposits, and how much?
  2. Batch 1: how many installs, and when?
  3. Where it lives: selma.au, and the conference QR
  4. Who owns follow-up within 24 hours
05
Sales and events

We'd have sold at the conference if we'd been selling.

Simon's noteThat was our first go at a conference, and as Katie said, we probably would've sold a couple, or at least had very warm leads, if we were selling yesterday. I should get around the conference and pitch competition scene for a while.

What has to be in the bag before the next event

1. A founding price sheet

One page: upfront, licence, what's included, founding discount and expiry, "quotes valid 90 days" so NFPs can put it in grant budgets.

2. A reservation form

Paper and QR, the same fields as the online waitlist form.

3. A paid pilot offer

A 90-day pilot fee credited in full to year one. Objectives, milestones, baseline, responsibilities, and conversion terms. Unpaid pilots tend to stall.

4. A one-page letter of intent

Non-binding except confidentiality: use case, deployment, users, indicative price and budget source, start window.

5. The grant-ready quote and a procurement pack

Capability statement, insurances, security summary, how to buy (direct, quote or panel).

6. The unplugged demo

Pull the ethernet cable and it still answers. The most persuasive thing a stand can show.

A shortlist of about eight events, not thirty

WhenEventWhereWhyMode
12–14 OctACFID National ConferenceCanberraDevelopment NGOs and DFAT; follows straight on from Situation 2026Attend, pre-book meetings
Oct (TBC)GovAI26CanberraAI in the APS; showcase free, partner slots openShowcase or partner
27–28 OctAI Leadership Summit (CEDA, National AI Centre)SydneySenior business and government AI buyers; A$990Attend
11 NovDTA AI Government ShowcaseCanberra600+ APS decision-makers; SME exhibitor spots (applications closed 11 Sep)Exhibit if accepted
12–13 NovFiji Tech SummitNatadola, FijiThe Pacific's largest IT event; hub-and-spoke storyAttend or sponsor
2–4 DecNACCHO Members' Conference + Australasian Aid ConferenceCanberra, same week1,000+ ACCHO delegates; aid researchers and DFAT. One trip, two rooms.Attend, with care on data sovereignty
9–11 MarGov Data SummitCanberra800+ public sector data and AI leadersExhibit
Mid-MarInfoxchange NFP Technology Awards (entries)OnlineEnter with a pioneer partnerAward entry
24–25 MarImpact Investment Summit Asia PacificSydneyInvestors, foundations, family officesInvestor
May (TBC)Infoxchange Tech for Social JusticeMelbourneThe NFP tech buyer eventExhibit
June (TBC)NDS state conferencesSeveral citiesDisability provider CEOs, pioneer-partner territoryExhibit

Also worth a look: LGNSW (22–24 Nov), Legal Innovation and Tech Fest (Apr), Accounting Business Expo (Mar), PITA forum in Fiji (Apr). SXSW Sydney is cancelled for 2026 and 2027, and Pitch@Palace looks inactive. Full calendar of ~35 events in the research notes.

Pitch competitions and awards

  • They bring profile and investor exposure, rarely sales
  • Best returns: Infoxchange NFP Tech Awards, InnovationAus Awards (~June), Australian AI Awards (~Aug), iAwards (free)
  • Recurring impact pitch nights are cheap practice, not a pipeline

Follow-up rhythm

  • Grade every lead at the stand: A (budget path, within 6 months), B, C
  • Same evening: personal email to A and B with the price sheet
  • Day 2: call A leads to book a readiness call. Day 14: propose a pilot or reservation
  • Book 20-minute coffees two weeks before each event. Attend first, exhibit second.

To decide

  1. Which events we commit to before Christmas, and who goes
  2. The stand kit: who builds the price sheet, form, pilot offer and letter of intent
  3. How much of Simon's time goes to events and pitching versus direct selling
06
Xav and dev support

Free the founder to sell.

Simon's noteXav and dev support, to validate everything I've made, but also to free me up from tech work so I can be a little sales machine.

The research surfaced a technical to-do list that sits squarely in "validate what's been built" and doesn't need Simon. The July investor pack named two hires in the use of funds (a developer and a project manager), so this is also the story the raise pays for.

WorkstreamWhy it matters commerciallyUnlocks
Independent code and security review; hardening guide; penetration testEvery government and enterprise buyer will ask. A pen test is ~A$15K–40K.Government, enterprise
Model options and a published model list (Llama, Mistral, Gemma, Granite alongside Qwen)Removes the Chinese-origin question for government, DFAT and banksGovernment, development, enterprise
Re-quote the build at current memory prices; spec a panel-listed OEM option (Dell or Lenovo)The A$3K cost may have drifted; OEM hardware answers supply-chain questionsPricing, government
Productise commissioning: templated Constitutions per sector, standard connectors, remote measurement5–10 days per install limits scale; SMEs need 2–3Margin, SMEs, channels
Licence engine: monthly data and skills pack pipeline, update signing and deliveryMakes the annual fee realBusiness model
Measurement: a metering plug on a unit for a fortnight; a low-power (Jetson) port and one-panel solar testTurns estimates into claims DFAT can rely onDevelopment, offline
R&D records kept as work happensNeeded for the 43.5% R&D Tax Incentive refundCash
Security documentation pack: questionnaire answers, data flow, exit plan, CPS 230 scheduleCuts weeks from every procurementGovernment, enterprise

To decide

  1. Xav's scope and start date; what's paid now versus after the raise
  2. Which two or three workstreams come first
  3. What Simon stops doing, and by when
07
Timeline to commercials

A draft to argue with.

Simon's noteTimeline to commercials.

Built from the dates already on the calendar. The earlier Selma plan said "product complete Q3 2026, go to market Q4 2026". This keeps that shape.

This week

All three pioneer units set up

Pioneers running on premises with signed or ready-to-sign Charters.

Week of 28 Sep

Commercials Day

Sectors, price, licence, waitlist, brand decided. Ask the capex contact which scheme he meant.

By 10 Oct

Price published, waitlist live

Founding price sheet, reservation form, paid pilot offer, letter of intent, grant-ready quote. In the bag for ACFID.

Oct

Pioneer conversion conversations

Founding partner rate offered to the three pioneers. First investor conversations with the new price in hand.

5 Nov

OVIC's block on AI in Victorian child protection ends

A reason to talk to Victorian community service organisations.

Nov

First paid pilot or priced letter of intent

The single thing investors will weight most. DTA showcase and Fiji Tech Summit in the same month.

Early Dec

Canberra week; ADM transparency starts 10 Dec

NACCHO and the Australasian Aid Conference. Qld grant results announced.

Mid Dec

First close of the raise (one option)

Before the summer slowdown.

Q1 2027

Batch 1 installs; final close

First paying installs from the waitlist. Gov Data Summit and Impact Investment Summit in March.

Apr–Jun 2027

Capital budget season

Councils and agencies spending unspent capital before 30 June. The capex pitch has its best window.

To decide

  1. Date the price is published
  2. Date of the first paid install we're aiming for
  3. Size and date of Batch 1
08
Investor strategy

Investment buys help and focus. Choose it for the help.

Simon's noteInvestment buys us help and focus, so I think we need it. Good to get a focused and agreed plan here that we can properly chase.
A$500K
The pre-seed SAFE on the table. A normal angel-led round; small for institutional VCs.
Aus practitioner guides: A$200K–750K typical Secondary
A$4M–7M
A plausible post-money cap without revenue. Paid pilots support the top end.
Estimate
30 Sep
End of Q3, the original close target. Mid-Dec first close or Feb final close is realistic.
Estimate
#1 gap
No price has ever been charged. One paid conversion beats any deck change.

Who fits

TierWhoWhy
AnchorsThe impact investor friend (A$75K–100K); 3–6 impact-minded angels from their network; Sydney Angels (six cycles a year); Scale Investors if the founding team meets their gender-equity criteriaMission-aligned, realistic on valuation, fastest to commit
StretchGiant Leap; Tripple; Australian Impact Investments (gateway to foundation money); Rampersand (vertical AI thesis)Bigger cheques, credibility, possible lead
For seed, laterMain Sequence, AirTree, Folklore, Investible, Square PegSend updates now; pitch with revenue
Non-dilutiveR&D Tax Incentive; NVIDIA Inception (hardware pricing, free); CSIRO Kick-Start; Startmate (A$120K, best after A$250K is committed so it comes in on our terms)Runway and help without dilution
Development moneyDFAT, ADB, UNCDFRealistically customers, not investors. EMIIF invests through funds; the Business Partnerships Platform has closed.

Four ways to sequence it

Option 1

Angel-led impact round now

Anchor the friend, 20–30 conversations, first close mid-December. Fastest, but at a lower cap with free pilots only.

Option 2

Prove the price first

Convert pioneers and publish pricing Oct–Dec, small bridge from the friend if needed, raise Feb–Apr with revenue at a better cap.

Option 3

Accelerator-anchored

Close A$250K from angels, then Startmate on the same terms. Programme time is the cost.

Option 4

Pacific contract first

Raise off a funded development contract. Strongest proof, slowest and least certain.

Things to check with the accountant or lawyer

  • ESIC tax offsets: SAFE holders only qualify at conversion, and EthicAI's consulting income may fail the entity test
  • Whether the SAFE stays in EthicAI Pty Ltd (see brand, item 9)
  • A short conflict of interest and anti-bribery policy before any Pacific deal

The adviser who wants to invest

  • He's shaping a procurement Selma could be part of. Fiji's 2026 procurement guidelines, DFAT guidance and Australia's foreign bribery laws all apply in some form.
  • Options: decline with thanks; defer until after procurement (no promised terms); accept only with his principal's written consent, recusal and legal advice; or drop the Fiji pathway.

To decide

  1. Which sequencing option
  2. Round size, cap range and first-close date
  3. The help we want from investors (a written "help wanted" list)
  4. How we respond to the adviser
  5. Who owns the raise day to day
10
Late addition · Selma Enterprise

A near-frontier model in the building, at ten times the price.

Simon's noteSo far Selma is all about small language models. What if we had an enterprise version that's 10x the price but capable of running 400GB VRAM models?

This answers the biggest objection on the enterprise page: that a small model on a 16GB card gets compared with Copilot and loses. Open-weight models are now within about 4–6 points of the best cloud model on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. A box that can hold one turns "small but safe" into "near-frontier and safe". Quick scan, ~20 sources

384GB
Four RTX Pro 6000 cards (96GB each). The sweet spot for a 400B-class model.
A$190–240K
Delivered cost: hardware ~A$140–165K plus install, security pack and year-one support Estimate
20–35%
Margin at A$300K. An 8-card 768GB build would need A$450–550K. Estimate
200–500
Named users one 384GB box could serve (20–50 active at once) Estimate

What makes it interesting

  • It fills the gap between Selma and the AI factories. Dell and HPE are quote-only and integrator-led; one 8-GPU H200 server alone is A$450–640K.
  • Against Mistral self-hosted (~A$340K a year in licences before hardware), A$300K once plus A$60–100K a year is cheaper from year two.
  • The same governance suite, Charter and commissioning, just a bigger brain. Buyers: law firms, health networks, state agencies, universities, super funds, defence primes with 200–1,000 staff.

What makes it hard

  • Almost every model this size is Chinese (DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, GLM). The main non-Chinese option is Mistral Large 3 (French, Apache 2.0), which only just fits in 384GB. For government and regulated buyers that shapes the pitch.
  • GPU prices are rising: the RTX Pro 6000 is up 87% since launch (~A$25K each in Australia). Quotes need price-adjustment clauses.
  • 3–3.5kW, loud, needs a server room. A different install and support job from a tower under a desk.
  • Enterprise buyers will expect SLAs, spare parts, certifications and a vendor-risk review.
Hardware routeMemoryApprox A$Note
4x RTX Pro 6000 server384GB140K–165K hwBest value for a 400B-class model
8x RTX Pro 6000 server768GB260K–300K hwFits the largest open models; needs A$450K+ price
NVIDIA DGX Station GB300252GB fast + 496GB slower133K–165KOffice-friendly tower, but only 252GB is fast GPU memory
Mac Studio M5 Ultra 512GB (from late Oct)512GB unified~16K–30K eachQuiet and cheap; weak with many users at once
8x H200 / B200 server1.1–1.4TB450K–760KOverkill at this price

Model names and versions move fast and sources disagree; check before quoting. NVIDIA's AI Enterprise licence (~A$40K a year for four GPUs) is optional, since open-source serving software works without it. Full notes: research/12.

The model Simon has in mind: InternLM Atria-Dawn-Preview. An agentic model from the Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory built on GLM-5.2: 744B parameters, mixture-of-experts, 256K context, text only, MIT licence, with an official FP8 version. Strong on deep research (96.0 DeepSearchQA), function calling and cybersecurity tasks; behind Claude Opus 5 on coding (59.6 vs 74.7 SWE-bench Pro). At FP8 it is roughly 750GB, so it needs the 8-card 768GB box. A 4-bit quantisation would be around 380–420GB, tight on 384GB with little room for many users. Size estimates Two things to weigh: it's a preview, and it comes from a Chinese government-backed lab, which government and regulated buyers will ask about. Its strength in tool use and multi-step research suits Selma's corpus and grant-analysis use cases well.

To decide

  1. Is Selma Enterprise on the roadmap for 2027, or a later idea?
  2. One customer to build it for first, or build and then sell?
  3. Default model: a non-Chinese model with others opt-in, or best-available?
  4. Does it carry the Selma name, or a separate tier name?
09
Brand architecture

An EthicAI product, or its own thing?

Simon's noteEthicAI product versus standalone. We've discussed it in bits and pieces; let's make a concrete decision.
OptionWhat it looks likeForAgainst
A. EthicAI product (today)"Selma, by EthicAI". One company, one team; SAFE into EthicAI Pty Ltd.EthicAI's ethics and governance credibility is the trust that sells Selma to NFPs and government. Simple.Investors see a consultancy with a product. Blackbird's Giants excludes services businesses; ESIC may fail on consulting income. Selma's value is harder to separate for a later sale.
B. Endorsed brand, same companySelma has its own identity, site and voice; "an EthicAI company" in small print. Separate accounts internally.Keeps the trust link and lets Selma grow a brand of its own. Easy to spin out later. Sub-brands (Selma Practice, Selma Field) sit cleanly under it.Still one legal entity for investors; needs discipline to keep the numbers apart.
C. Standalone companySelma Pty Ltd, with EthicAI as founding shareholder and ethics partner. Investors put money into Selma.Clean for investors, ESIC and a mission-aligned acquisition. Clear IP ownership.Setup cost and time now; licence and services agreements between the two; the raise and SAFE paperwork change.
D. EthicAI becomes SelmaThe consultancy folds into the product company over time.Maximum focus.Gives up consulting income that currently funds the team, and EthicAI's education and advisory work.

Questions that decide it

  • Who do buyers trust: Selma, or EthicAI behind it?
  • Where do investors put their money, and does that need to be clean before the raise?
  • Does commercial Selma (SMEs, enterprise) need a sub-brand to protect the mission story?
  • What does the Pacific version carry: an Australian brand, or a local name for each place?

Already on record

  • The SAFE is "an investment directly into EthicAI Pty Ltd, dedicated to Selma"
  • The endgame line: global scale, open to a mission-aligned buyer
  • selma.au already runs as its own site, "by EthicAI"

To decide

  1. A, B, C or D, and whether it changes before or after the raise
  2. Sub-brands for commercial and field versions: yes or no